(Satar from aldiyar and Abulizi from YIKMAT will offer each 500 US dollars to award the scientific talent who can develop new the Newton’s Law)
Tutor of the paper:
Wuper•Yunus, associate professor, director and chairman of board of Xinjiang Modern Occupational Technology College; Padamuhan•Mainik, Lecturer of physics of the Xinjiang Modern Occupational Technology College; Adily•Maimaity (from Jiashi County) Associate Professor and Master Instructor of Law and Politics Institute, Xinjiang Normal University
Authors:
Akmu’aini aldiyar , Aini•Naiyim aldiyar , Abuliz•Abula YIKMAT, Satar•Wusman aldiyar , Azguly•Keyumu YIKMAT, Mulila•Wupur ,yasin xukur YIKMAT,
Main contents
It is Newton who combined the religion and the science, put himself in God's position, established the Three Laws and became a successful physicist. Newton did not find himself this logic error, neither did the physicists pay attention to this issue 300 years later after Newton.
(1) In 1684, when Newton summed up the whole universe as a huge mechanical clock, he felt that God forgot to energize this clock for the first time to make it move, then requested the God to do it, if you are the God, are you willing to come?
(2) If the omniscient God would not come, then how did Newton's mechanical clock move? Was it Newton who made the clock to move with the first clause, and then established Newton's first law?
(3) In the same time when Newton requested the God, Unconsciously denied all the discoveries by scientists from the era of Aristotle to the year of 1684. In the time before Newton, Nothing was moved.
(4)The logic of Newton’s laws consider that, all the movement from the atom to solar system including human beings and animals, also started in 1684 i.e. the time when Newton requested the external force.
(5) In 1684, Newton denied the entire scientific basis related to the universe movement when he studied universal gravitation together with Robert Hooke. And the universal gravitation commenced after Newton became the God.
(6) The year in which Newton requested the God and established the First Law has already passed 2320 years. The whole world does not recognize this fact yet.
(7) Newton's logic believed that the God is an external object out of all objects, not the spirit; this differs from the conception of the invisible God mentioned in the Bible.
Key Word: Scientific development concept and new development of Engel’s logic; the Big Bang Theory; subtraction of the mathematics.
It can be seen that British Royal Society and Cambridge University did not notice Newton’s logic errors for 320 years. We have always considered that Newton is one of the greatest scientists in the world. In the past 300 years or so, our worship was overheated, nobody noticed the basis of Newton's laws – what does the external force mean? Is the External Force God requested by Newton matter or spirit? Although our previous paper Emperor's New Clothes and New Newton's Laws was spread to many places in the world, few people understood this new law.
During more than one year after publishing our Paper, we continued studying Newton's laws and we found we committed a grave logical mistake, and it is also a common mistake of the human beings i.e. we neglected the concept of ‘Almighty God is omniscient and all good’. The religion has many categories, Newton professed Christian in his middle age, therefore when we analyzed Newton's laws in the position of Christians we found we were all wrong. Now it is known publicly that Einstein's theory of relativity is very difficult to understand. At least, Einstein should know his theory, but Newton himself did not know how he became the God.
Of course, any religion shall not publicly acknowledge that Newton is a God, but the reality of 300 years proved that any one of the religious believers does not oppose the external force – God requested by Newton in Newton's laws. They did not ask why God denied himself, why the God came to help Newton, could it be that the God did not have other choice but help Newton? Is it true that the motion did not exist in the universe before Newton requested God? What did the scientists before Newton study? Please read the following analysis:
Monthly UFO Exploration published a paper Inextricably Involved Interlink in its volume of June, 2002. The author presents in the thesis "The first milestone in theoretical physics belongs to Newton, his world view is mechanical, he believed that the universe was a huge clock, everything was determined accurately, and this clock excluded completely the effect of the spirit. Newton's merit will never be neglected; nevertheless, the huge universe clock he found was lack of a first push, that is, who will start its wind spring for this huge clock? He had no alternative, ha had to request the external force to help him. However, after the clockwork spring of this universe clock was fully wound up through external force, Newton did not allow external force to land a hand to the matters of the universe. After that everything would be dominated by the laws discovered by Newton.
Analysis (1) - Christians’ Bible believed that the God created the Earth on October 23, Sunday of 4004 BC. It can be said that just before the end the sixth day, the God had created everything (all objects) including the human beings i.e. Adam and Eve etc - the highest level of existence of the objects. Of course, the movement began with the birth of mankind. The movements conducted earlier than human beings were the movements by the whole solar system and all the celestial bodies and all other matters, which refers to the solar system, Earth, atoms, molecules, elementary particles. With Logical thinking of a Christian, people can also find that before Newton requested God, they had moved for more than 2,320years, that is 4004-1684 = 2320. This is a very simple mathematical algorithm, Newton was a mathematical genius, and unfortunately he did not pay attention to this small problem. If he noted it, he would not request the God in 1684. Under normal circumstances, what an authority’s statement means business and the majority’s saying is right. This formula 4004 year-1684 year = 2320 year demonstrates that scientists are common human beings, not gods, including the scientists from British Academy and the University of Cambridge, they will make mistakes too.
(2)Now we have relatively complete Big Bang theory, which has been awarded Nobel Prize for six times. The matters in physical research mentioned in the theory of Big Bang and the matters defined in Marxist philosophy were formed during a Big Bang about 13.7 billion years ago, and then about 13.695 billion years later after the Big Bang, human spirit appeared, and this spirit moved about136.94998316 billion years to develop into Newton era. These figures prove Marxist philosophy “substance is primary and consciousness is secondary.” This basic principle is correct and non-critical. We also found Newton's logic error through this criterion. If all people think of Newton's laws in this logic way, the problem is very clear.
(3)It is difficult for us to understand that Newton did not recognize Aristotle’s On the Heavens, Geocentric Theory by XX in 1st century AD and Heliocentric Theory by Nicolas Copernicus in 16th century. Johannes Kepler’s three laws of planetary motion and Dialog between Science and Faith by Galileo and other theories studied the rules of the object movement, although some point of view of these theories differ greatly, their common ground is: the solar system and objects of solar system are in motion before the birth of Newton. The movement continues for more than 2320 years. Newton did not need to request the God and the God does not need to come.
(4)Recent scientific research discovers that gravity formula was firstly put forward by Robert Hooke. Newton adopted this formula, developed his own theories, at that time Newton did not admit Hooke’s contribution. Newton studied the movement of the Earth, Moon and Apples. When Newton invented the law of mechanical motion, he did not notice the moon and the apple were in motion.
(5)In physics, the impact of an object onto another object is called the force. At that time the whole solar system is an integral body of all the objects. Besides the solar system, other objects exist, which made the first drive for the solar system and all objects in the solar system. According to the explanation of logic of physics, God is an exterior object out of all objects. Then, how did the God, an exterior object start this movement? In times of Newton, the God was a kind of spirit but not objects. In the meantime, we found that the God obeyed Newton's request. When God was requested, he would come. When the movement of the mechanical clock was over, Newton would mandatorily send God away, or would not let the God participate in the rest issues. Newton could manage the God.
(6)Another analysis is like this - We are relatively familiar with the books on the presentation of Newton's life in scientific fields just like Biography of Newton etc., The information says, Newton joined the Christian in his middle age. Just at that time, he believed that the reason for the movement of all objects was due to God. That is, when the God created this universe, he moved the entire universe with the First Cause. Here is a suspected problem, in the Bible, God created all lives on earth on October 23, 4004 B.C. (Sunday). God spent totally six days to create all the objects; we do not know that date is the first day or the sixth day in which the God created all things.
In one word, the mechanical clock mentioned by Newton was made completely by the God in the sixth day. Of course, this mechanical clock referred to the sun, earth, moon, living human beings, animals, atoms in microscopic world and combination of numerous objects in the whole universe. Our questions remain that the God pushed once when he created each object, or only after the construction of the whole mechanical clock (all objects) had completed, he pushed it to move with the first clause? A key problem is the time for Newton’s mechanical clock to move and the time for the objects inside this mechanical clock to move differ in time sequence i.e. the starting times are different. The God created everything, so should hundred million times of first cause or once of pushing force be used? If hundred of million times of pushes are conducted, this mechanical clock should have hundred of million of clocks, so hundred of million of pushing force and hundred of million of time shall be needed.
If a hundred of million times of pushing was not needed, all the objects did not move from the first day to the sixth day, the motion is the form for substances to exist. Is possible that the God did not know such a simple question? The procedure of the objects from elementary particles to whole solar system etc lies in motion in various layers; infinite objects need infinite pushing forces. Besides now new species of substances come into being continuously on the earth, as it were, now the God is using infinite pushes to move these new objects. In this way the God has no way to have a rest.
We admit the first push from the Newton’s logic, but we have no way to know the right time-the time for the first clause to exert its effect, was the first second of the first day or the last second of the sixth day? If it exerted its effect in the first day, this force moved the matters of the micro word of elemental particles and atom etc; if it moved in the sixth day, what was its form of existence during the first day and the sixth day? Nobody cold solve this problem. The problem is the first clause theory was put forward by Newton, so this first clause theory cannot be the real reason for the movement of the objects.
(7)As we mentioned above, Newton established Newton's Law under the premise of combining religion and physics. Therefore, we use the traditional religious point of view to analyze Newton's laws. They see more clearly how Newton put himself in God's position and set up Newton's laws and the evidence to control our thinking. We can see through the basic elements that during 320 years after the birth of Newton's law to nowadays, scientists from the field of Christian do not notice whether the God is omniscient?
Is the God the spirit as stated in Christianity or material as Babbage states? Actually Newton’s logic is not the same with Babbage; Babbage did not think that Newton was the God. We support Newton's law, unconsciously receiving Newton is God. The God is the object out of all objects, because in physics the impact by an object onto other object is called the force, thus the objects inherent in the first clause should be the first object, not the spirit.
(8)The history of Newton's first law, Galileo once conducted such tests in this field, but his test objects were an iron ball and the space for ball movement. When Newton developed this idea, this ball represented all the objects including humans and animals, atoms and objects smaller than atoms.
(9)In 1900 when physicists discovered through tests that Newton's law could not explain the motion of atoms and objects smaller than the atoms. Professor Stephen Hawking from Cambridge University said “Today’s scientific development does not use the theory of First Clause, the universe can have motion.” The problem we mention is also related to the issue of the first clause. The first clause that Professor Hawking talked about should the pushing force of the God, not Newton’s first clause. Then could the traditional Newton's law be changed? The paper Emperor's New Clothes and New Newton's Laws developed Newton’s logical point of view and developed his laws.
(10)Humans now generally acknowledged that Newton's laws of motion and gravity are the theory to explain the movement of objects as an integral theoretical system. So you can judge the objects stated in all objects and the objects mentioned in gravity have the same concept. Of course, when we study the substances of gravity through the point of view of Marxist philosophy, we can find that in fact the targets of the research by the two subjects are the same contents and similar objective existence. What it differs is we have difference point of view and thinking. Regarding the basic form of matters, we refer the unity between objects and substances put forward by Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity, and they have the same concept.
Einstein is the most famous scientists of the 20th century and also regarded as the most famous scientists in human history. In 1905 he published Special Theory of Relativity, which unified the concept of materials between physics and philosophy. But we have not accepted his main logic.
The first logic that is not accepted - That is the sameness of humanity defined in natural sciences and social sciences, which was unified by Einstein. Physicists and philosophers now still consider that the substance in physics and the matter of Marxist philosophy is different, they are two different concepts. Here is a simple explanation, the premise of the movement of objects in physics aspect is external force, whereas Marxist philosophy keeps the concept that the premise of the motion of the matter is mainly the internal factors, but the external factors plays the role of the side effects. Of course, this view is our previous result before we developed Engels's basic form of movement. Surely the problem is not such simple, because we can see from Einstein's special theory of relativity that the human, animal, atoms, molecules and elementary particles studied in physics and Marxist philosophy are the same, are all born at the same time about 137 million years.
Our previous paper Emperor's New Clothes and New Newton's Laws is based on the logic of Marxism. In more than one year after its publication, we received valuable comments from many teachers of physics and fans engaged in the comprehensive research of the logic of Marxism. During this period of more than one year, we found that our original thesis has certain shortcomings after communication and argument with them through telephone and e-mail etc. the mistakes and shortcomings are - although Marxist view of history is a scientific world view, Marxism has not spread to every corner of the world yet, for many countries - religion is the state religion, and their number of population is considerable. However they did not study in the standpoint of religion the problem- Could Newton request the God or not. They have always supported Newton's law.
Not paying attention to the spirit of religion. They analyzed Newton's law on the basis of their standpoints, yet they also found weakness of Newton's law in simple way. Thus people must conduct the research of Newton's law with Marxist world view and develop Newton's laws on this basis. Thus New Newton's laws come into the world.
The experts we contact through various channels are:
Aikpar, associate research fellow from Planning Office of XJ Region Party Committee; Palidan•Wupur, Germany education background; Abudu• Rixiti, Doctor of Mathematics, Professor, Vice President of Mathematics & Systematical Science College of Xinjiang University;, staff from Bank of Agriculture; Gu Shuigen,lin xin ping ,lin ni ,yao jin zhi ,chen bing , Liu Xinhua, Dou Wenqiang, Mai Yongqing senior journalists; Aspujiang•Yashen , lawyer of Xinjiang Gonglian Law Office Li Qiang, Bai Yutao, colleagues; Kerim•Aili, PhD from a Japan university, professor from XJ University of Agriculture; Muheta, from XJ University, France study background; Turdi•Wumar, physics PhD of Moscow University, Physics Institute attached to XJ Academy of Science; Abuliz •Abulaity, senior engineer from Institute of Exploration & Planning of National Land Resources of Turpan; Guzadinur•Juma, Baihelaty •Turxun, Peng Shi, Zhulipia •Jialaliding teachers from Urumqi No. 2 Middle School; Aikpa, Studies Section of Urumqi No.6 Middle School; Yalikun, teacher from Studies Section of Urumqi No.6 Middle School; Sdik•Maisudy, Turpan TV Station; Bari from Turpan Bureau of Civil Affairs; adila aini(Yikmat), Gulibahar•Nurdun (Yikmat) assistant of the authors; Caimaitijiang, XJ Science and technology Newspaper; Adilijiang•Ablimity, Channel 9 of XJ TV Station; Maitiniyazi•mainik, Niyazi•Ezizi, Afar•Wupur, ,anwar amislim ,Bawudong•Silajiding from Turpan Aiding Lake Middle School; Patar•Maimaity, Maimaity•Chaidu from XJ Water Conservancy and Electric Power School; Aihemaity•Maimaity from Petroleum Hospital; Adily•Yasheng from Urumqi Shuimogou District; Ainiwa•Abdureyimu, Amty•Mayity, Senior Engineer from Water Conservancy Department; Abliz•Wusman, Ainy•Mutaly from Hami City etc. The original paper has been modified fore many times, but we feel that there are still many deficiencies.
As the facts above mentioned, we may find that no matter it is Newton's law or Marxist philosophy both need developing, both science need to replenish mutually. The development of modern physics promotes the development of Marxist philosophy; in the meantime Marxist philosophy looked back and discovered the mistake made over 300 years ago. Newton's law has been developed, from this fact, we naturally find why not select Marxist philosophy as common textbook for the world. Further, we think Marxist philosophy should be selected as an optional course in all universities around the world. This point of view is another kind of new development of Marx - Engels (The Communist Manifesto). Marxism is a theory which Keep pace with the times, when the times goes forward, the theory also develops. New development of Engels’s theory (basic form of the matter).
Marx and Engels cooperated for 40 years and created jointly Marxist theory. Classics of Marxist theory – regarding the reasons for the motion and development of any matter, the internal factors of the matter play principal role and the exterior factors play side effects during the implementation. This point of view can replace the reasons for the motion of Newton’s mechanical clock. New Newton's laws are established on this basis. The papers we are studying this time include:
(1) The Basic Form of the Matter
(2) Einstein’s Logic Error
(3) Correct Special Relativity
(4) Big Bang energy formula
(5) The Universal Gravity Newton Created
And more papers. We can cooperate and we have the ability to de it well if any research institute or foundation has these subjects in its project.
YIKMAT and ADIYAR two trademarks offer each € 500 to reward scientific talents who can develop the point of view, unlimited number, time is scheduled in the period after the releasing date within three years, and the standpoint must be based on new development of Marxist philosophy (basic form of materials).
References
1. Selected Works of Marx and Engels, Volume 4, People's Publishing House published in 1972
2. Selected Works of Mao Zedong, Volume 1-5, People's Publishing House Edition1991,
3. Selected Works of Lenin Volume 1-6 People's Publishing House, Edition 1994
4. Selected Works of Deng Xiaoping, Volume 1-2, People's Publishing House, Edition 1994,
5. 25 Theoretical issues concerned by cadres and the masses, Bureau of the CPC Central Committee Propaganda Department of the theory. - Learning Press 2003-2 printed for the first time
6. Greatest scientists in the world (UK) John•Fan Dayton etc. Jin Yin translator
(strongly recommended works by 2007 Nobel Prize award-winning scientists) Heilongjiang Science and Technology Press. May 2008
7. Brief History of Time from the Big Bang to Black Holes by Stephen•Hawking, translated by Wu Zhongchao, Hunan Science and Technology Press (10-year revised and enlarged edition)
8. Did Einstein believe the God? Author Fang Zhouzi, Guangxi Science and Technology Press, August 2009 first edition, Author Liang Heng, Uygur language edition translated by Maimaitijiang•Nuerwula Urumqi: Xinjiang People's Publishing House. 2006 March
9. UFO Exploration; all magazines from 2001 to 2008
10. Imperialism Excellent Financial by Engels, People's Publishing House July 1978, Uygur version
11. Dialectics of Nature by Engels People’s Publishing House1978 July
12. Principles of Marxist Philosophy - Uygur version. 1984 teaching materials by Peng Xizi,
13. UFO Exploration Volume VI Inextricably Involved Interlink
14. Concise Astronomy Guide Science Press
Akmu’aini aldiyar Jianshe Rd. Branch of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, Agricultural Bank of China Limited
Aini•Naiyimu aldiyar Education background in Japan Master degree, Xinjiang Airline
Abuliz•Abula YIKMAT director of Xinjiang Zemin New Technical Project Development Institute
Satar•Wusiman• aldiyar general manager of Xinjiang Turpan Aldiya Fruit Industry Co., Ltd.
Azguly•keyumu YIKMAT, employee of Xinjiang Huakang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Yasin xukur YIKMAT of Xinjiang Zemin New Technical Project Development Institute
Reference:
An email attachment:
fromakimenistiyin
to"drs.kuk"
Date: Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 10:34 PM
Blog of the Writer:
http://blog.163.com/akimenistiyin@yeah/
